Logic Bombs
" Thoughtful indie logic puzzle game with pure deduction but lacks in-game rule references "
Logic Bombs Review
Logic Bombs is a thoughtfully designed, grid-based puzzle game that challenges players with pure deductive reasoning. Drawing comparisons to Sudoku, Picross, and Minesweeper, it offers a unique blend of logic puzzles that evolve in complexity as you progress. The game boasts over 160 puzzles, steadily introducing new mechanics without overwhelming players. Many reviewers praised the game's elegant rule system, which encourages players to discover emergent logical theorems beyond the basic rules. The minimalist graphics and sound design support a meditative experience, focusing attention on the puzzles themselves. Despite its simplicity, the game provides a deep and rewarding challenge, with no need for guessing or trial and error.
Some players noted minor issues with the user interface, such as a lack of in-game rule references and limited marking tools for assumptions, which could improve ease of play. The difficulty curve is mostly smooth but occasionally uneven. Overall, Logic Bombs is highly recommended for fans of logic puzzles seeking a pure, challenging, and satisfying experience at an excellent value.
Highlights
Players especially praise the game's pure logic-based gameplay, where every puzzle can be solved through deduction without guessing.
The emergent rules and mechanics create rewarding "ah-ha" moments as players discover deeper logical connections.
The minimalist but clear graphics and sound design complement the meditative and focused puzzle-solving atmosphere.
With over 160 puzzles, the game offers substantial content and value, keeping players engaged for dozens of hours.
The gradual introduction of mechanics helps players learn naturally, making the experience accessible yet challenging.
Criticisms
Some players found the difficulty uneven, with certain puzzles feeling disproportionately hard or obscure.
The lack of an in-game rulebook or quick reference forces players to remember all rules or backtrack to earlier puzzles.
There is no assumption marking system, making it harder to track logical deductions involving hypothetical placements.
The level selector and options menu were described as clunky or janky by some users.
A few puzzles involving sums or question mark bombs were noted as counterintuitive or frustrating.
Pros
- • Pure logic puzzles with no need for guessing or trial and error.
- • Emergent mechanics that reward discovering complex logical theorems.
- • Large number of puzzles providing excellent value and replayability.
- • Gradual introduction of rules keeps learning natural and engaging.
- • Minimalist graphics focus attention on puzzle solving.
- • Satisfying and rewarding puzzle design for logic enthusiasts.
- • Smooth difficulty curve with mostly well-balanced challenges.
Cons
- • No in-game quick reference for rules, requiring backtracking or notes.
- • Lack of marking tools for assumptions complicates solving.
- • Occasional uneven difficulty spikes and obscure puzzles.
- • Clunky level selector and options menu detract from UX.
- • Some puzzles with sums or question mark bombs feel unintuitive.
- • Minimalistic presentation may feel too barebones to some players.
- • No customizable color schemes or advanced UI options.
Rating Criteria
Welcome to a realm of pure logic, where rules are rules and the next step can always be deduced.